Good guys & bad guys: Best buddies 4eva!

Both men in the picture are heterosexual (just in case you were wondering). You can replace one or both of them with women, if you want. Gender is irrelevant here.

I wanted the good guy to be male simply because I wanted to quote a totally awesome line from the movie “Supergirl” (2026). There is a scene with Kara (Supergirl) and her friend. Firstly, her friend asked:

“What’s Superman like?”

Kara answered:

“He sees the good in everyone, and I see the truth.”

Kara’s answer instantly turned me into a fan of her. 🤩🤩🤩

The #1 reason why the good guys fail to make a functioning civilized society is that they insist on welcoming everybody into their society and not excluding criminals, sadomasochists, sociopaths, power addicts, tribal apes, etc.

Why did this behavior evolve in humans? Because it enables the good guys to profit from the unethical activities of the bad guys without feeling guilty about it. For example, quasi-slave labor (or wage slavery) enables the good guys to purchase products from the bad guys at a cheap price. The good guys benefit from the slavery and do not feel guilty about it, because they give the bad guys all of the blame and responsibility.

Thus the good guys and the bad guys are actually best buddies. They are lovers in bed with each other, having casual sex from time to time. No, wait, I was exaggerating. They are not best buddies. They are partners in crime. They are scatological freaks in bed, and they love to pee all over each other. No, wait, I’m exaggerating again. They are just partners in crime.

To make a well-functioning and civilized society, it is necessary to terminate the love affair between the good guys and the bad guys. Their partnership needs to go. It is approximately three thousand years overdue. This goal is not realistically possible to achieve. Therefore, many of the good guys must be rejected and excluded if the world’s first civilized society is ever to be made.

Sometimes the good guys claim that they are willing to exclude criminals and sadomasochists. They are talking BS. They are not willing. When they say that they are willing, you can test them by suggesting that genetic tests be performed to detect and reject sadomasochists.

The good guys vehemently reject this suggestion, and they invent fake excuses to protect their profitable love affair with the bad guys. For example, the good guys may claim that testing for sadomasochism is “eugenics”. They are hypocrites. They support genetic testing for Trisomy 21 (Down’s syndrome) and other genetic disorders, but they do not support testing for sadomasochism.

Now you can see that the good guys are not genuinely willing to exclude sadomasochists from society or positions of power. This is why it is necessary to observe a person’s actions instead of their words. The words and actions of many people are contradictory, because virtue signalling is a common social disorder in humans.

The hypocritical and contradictory behavior of good guys is often rooted in an anxiety disorder, cowardice, and a lack of courage. For many good guys, the mere existence of bad guys triggers so much anxiety that the good guys prefer to deal with it by indulging in the delusion that 99% of humans are good people.

Some other good guys use a different trick. They delude themselves into believing that everybody is mostly the same and that the wide diversity of human personalities simply does not exist. For example, consider the following opinion and how people respond to it:

“Putting women in charge is not the solution for making an idyllic society, because women are also highly competitive like men. Women backstab each other in the workplace just like men do.”

In reality, only a percentage of women (and men) are highly competitive and willing to sabotage each other. It is necessary to exclude these vicious people from society, but the good guys are unwilling to do it, because the good guys and the bad guys are in bed with each other (often literally in bed, fucking each other gleefully, indulging in delusions of moral goodness and grandeur).

It is not rare for a non-sadomasochist to produce sadomasochistic children with a sadomasochistic partner. The good guys wish to believe that all children are good and that sadomasochistic children do not exist, but the behavior of schoolchildren reveals a different story. Beginning in childhood and strengthening over time, a certain percentage of humans exhibit masochism or sadism or both.

Will a civilized human society or nation ever be created in the future? Or will every human society continue to be barbaric forever?

🧬🔬🧪 I am convinced that the world’s first civilized nation will never occur unless civilized and uncivilized humans are separated by using objective tests. The testing procedure should include genetic testing. It is critically necessary to develop objective tests for sadomasochism, psychopathy, sociopathy, self-delusion, religious psychosis, etc.

If the development of an objective test proves to be too difficult or impossible for a particular mental disorder, then the second-best option is a semi-objective test (this is far better than doing nothing).

So long as 100% of humans are welcome in a nation, a civilized nation is utterly impossible, just like how it is utterly impossible to make a civilized nation of chimpanzees.

Tribal apes will never ever be civilized unless their genome is modified or artificially selected for civilized behavior instead of leaving it to the barbaric process of evolution. Remember, evolution has no ethics. Evolution is a natural process that favors reproductive success including immoral methods that boost success.

Violent people may now project their own violent thoughts onto me and think that I am advocating for genocide or something like that. Don’t be ridiculous! I am not religious at all. Not even slightly.

I only worship Easter (the goddess of fertility), and Easter would never endorse genocide. Worshipping Easter does not make me religious, unless I join a religious cult, but I assure you, I have no intention of ever joining any religious organizations and engaging in genocide or warfare with the blessing of the one true god that always wants the same as I want.

The existing civilized people in the world could leave the uncivilized people behind. This means nothing would be done to the uncivilized people. For example, it is already the case that multiple countries (for example, Canada and others) restrict immigration to what they view as genetically superior humans.

Except of course they do not perform an actual genetic test, rather they test it indirectly by requiring that the immigrant be highly qualified. Extra bonus visa points for a PhD.

When somebody establishes a gentleman’s club with exclusive membership (such as requiring that new members be screened or invited by pre-existing members), this is obviously not a case of genocide or eugenics.

I will tell you what is really going on behind the facade: The good guys are very persistent in inventing all kinds of weird & wacky excuses to protect their relationship with the bad guys, because they profit from it. The good guys like to benefit from bad behavior without feeling guilty about it. They do this by conveniently shifting the blame to the bad guys or paying a bad guy to do the dirty work.

I can guarantee that at no point during the next one thousand years will a civilized human society ever be created while sadomasochists and tribal apes are welcome to participate in it.

When good guys and bad guys are literally in bed

In March 2026, CNN reported the results of their investigation into a “rape academy” website that was visited by millions of men. The users of this website shared tips and techniques for drugging and raping women. CNN’s article included the following example:

“When Zoe learned that her husband of 16 years had been crushing her son’s sleeping medicine into her tea and raping her while she was passed out, it shattered her world. [...] Her then husband’s confession came on an otherwise ordinary Sunday in 2018, after the couple – who share four children – had returned from church. “He reeled off a list of his wrongdoings... as if it was, you know, a shopping list,” Zoe said, [...]. He told her the abuse had been going on for years.”

I do not know the details of that particular case, but here is some general information. If you are a woman wondering whether your husband is drugging and raping you, then you can rule it out fairly easily by observing whether your husband regularly engages in bad behavior or not. As a result of long-term cohabitation, a wife knows her husband very well, much better than other people can know him.

If his behavior is almost always good (except for occasional understandable mistakes), then it is highly unlikely that he is drugging and raping his wife. The men to be worried about are those that regularly engage in bad behavior.

According to Gisèle Pelicot's memoir (“A Hymn to Life: Shame Must Change Sides”, 2026), her husband (Dominique Pelicot) drugged her and raped her and arranged for 70 strangers to rape her as well. This happened over the course of nearly a decade. He wanted to force a woman into submission.

She said that his demands included anal sex. Good men almost never want to have anal sex with women. When a man demands anal sex even when he knows that the woman dislikes it, he is most likely sadistic, controlling, and /or abusive. Women should not ignore this huge red flag. Women should not ignore any signs of a man being aroused by a woman's displeasure or lack of enjoyment.

Women should not ignore their husband’s regular bad behavior. I am stating the obvious, because unfortunately it is necessary to state and repeat this obvious information, because many of the good guys are extremely tolerant of bad behavior in their partner, coworkers, and elected politicians.

For example, in most cases, a politician must be extremely wicked and must engage in crimes repeatedly, again and again and again, to an extreme degree over a long time, before the majority of voters finally stop voting for him/her or his/her political party. The same thing happens with husbands and wives, because many of the good guys are extremely tolerant and accepting of ongoing bad behavior.

Some good guys ignore hundreds of signs over years. Basically, it is like there is an alarm regularly beeping in the background for years. Not loud, but easily noticeable. And many people just ignore it. For years. They do not want to know. They bury their head in the sand and suppress their own knowledge.

I do not mean the need to listen to one’s instincts. I mean directly observing or suffering bad behavior and then ignoring it. For example, a wife knows that her Church-going husband regularly borrows the neighbor’s lawnmower and siphons fuel out of it. When she asks him about the fuel that he takes from their neighbors, he shrugs and replies:

“They’re rich. They can afford it.”

However, the neighbor’s block of land is only 20% bigger than his, and their house is only marginally better, and they have large debts. She knows that he is stealing from them, but she accepts it anyway. One day, when a case of rape is reported in the news, he makes callous remarks about the victim:

“She should’ve just made the best out of a bad situation. She should’ve made a decision to enjoy the sex anyway. There’s no rule against enjoying it. Even bad guys can give women pleasure. There’s no sense in making it worse than it needs to be.”

The wife disagrees with her husband’s callous attitude, but she does nothing about it. In addition, she also does nothing whenever he tries to kick the neighbor’s cat. She also tolerates him repeatedly demanding anal sex and not caring about her discomfort and lack of enjoyment.

She ignores all of his bad behavior. She does not seek a divorce. Eventually, after many years of ignoring his bad behavior, she is shocked when she discovers that he has been drugging her and raping her while she was unconscious. She says that it shattered her world. Why now? Why not much earlier?

Good guys and bad guys commonly have a codependency, shared interests, and mutual acceptance. A civilized society is never going to happen so long as every human society continues to accept good guys that are knowingly in bed with bad guys, either literally or figuratively.

Being realistic about it, a civilized society is only possible with civilized humans, and civilized humans comprise less than 50% of the humans in the world.

The percentage of humans that are tribal-minded must be more than 50% (the majority), because if the percentage of tribal humans is less than 50% (a minority), then democracy would already function successfully, because tribal humans would have insufficient votes to elect abusive politicians.

The failure of democracy indicates that the tribal humans comprise at least 51% of the populace. They are fundamentally incapable of operating society in a civilized and ethical manner, because their brains have been programmed by thousands of years of evolution to operate in a barbaric tribal manner.