“Only yes means yes” = rape of women's rights
Envious singles want to put an end to couples having sex.
Apparently all of you are rapists and rape victims now, according to proposed new laws being demanded by female professors and radical feminists (as opposed to reasonable feminists).
Instead of creating a functional economy and affordable housing, some countries are working on a new law that will define most husbands and wives as rapists and rapees. Normal sex within relationships will be criminalized under the new law demanded by bitterly envious extremists and femcels.
The proposed new law decrees that if a wife nods, smiles encouragingly, and silently undresses herself instead of explicitly speaking the word “Yes”, then her gentle loving husband is a rapist and she is a rape victim, because sex will be legally consensual only when the word “Yes” is explicitly spoken aloud.
Silence will be automatically defined as rape even when the woman happily consents to sex!
There will be court cases where a gentle loving husband is accused of raping his wife, and the wife will stand up in court and scream with frustration:
“MY HUSBAND NEVER RAPED ME, YOU FUCKING MORONS!!!”
And the district attorney / public prosecutor will reply smugly:
“Your opinion is irrelevant. You don’t get to decide whether you were raped anymore. The state decides for you now, and the state has decided that you were raped regardless of what you say and think. The evidence shows that on July 4, you silently agreed to have sex with your husband, and that is rape according to the law.”
The wife will protest:
“But I wanted it! I consented! I nodded happily, and I enjoyed the sex! It was fantastic! I loved every second of it, and I was in full agreement with it all along!”
The prosecutor will reply:
“That’s all completely irrelevant. If you didn’t want your husband to be charged with rape and imprisoned, then you should have spoken the word ‘Yes’ aloud. Why didn’t you just simply say ‘Yes’?”
The wife will break down in tears and say:
“My husband didn’t do anything wrong, and we have four children! How am I supposed to take care of four children by myself if you put my husband in jail?!”
The sadistic prosecutor will reply smugly:
“Don’t worry about that. We have Children Protection Services to take care of your children. They will grow up just fine in a foster home.”
The wife will scream angrily:
“YOU FUCKING MONSTER!! I’LL KILL YOU!!!”
A broad grin will appear on the prosecutor’s face. He or she will say with great delight:
“Gotcha! Now you’re going to jail as well. Attempted murder, that was.”
If it is a sadistic male prosecutor, he will think:
“Oh God, what a win today! I am a magnificent prosecutor. Her daughters will probably end up as prostitutes eventually, thanks to the foster care system. That's great. We do need more prostitutes. We have a severe shortage of prostitutes under 20 years of age. Definitely need a lot more of those to help drive the prices down. Hmmm, maybe I'll get to fuck one of her daughters myself after a few years. Delicious!”
And it does not stop there. Envious extremists also demand that “Yes” must be regularly reaffirmed during the sex. Eventually, if the extremists are allowed to implement the laws that they demand, the first “Yes” will be valid for only the first three minutes of sex, and then any further sex beyond this time limit will be rape unless the word “Yes” is spoken again.
The envious extremists also claim that yes to sex does not mean yes to other activities during the sex such as touching or sucking the woman’s breast. Even after a wife says yes to sex, her husband will be required to ask politely during sex:
“May I touch your left breast now?”
And then if the wife silently nods in response, or if her husband gets confused about whether it was his left or her left, then she is a victim of the patriarchy, and she must be rescued from her evil oppressive husband, according to radical feminists that may be either heterosexual or homosexual femcels driven mad by their envy of happily married couples.
“The venom clamors of a jealous woman poison more deadly than a mad dog’s tooth.”
– William Shakespeare, 1592
I will tell you who the real rapists are: The jealous nutcases that demand that only yes means yes and that clear-and-obvious body language is unacceptable. They are the rapists. These evil little tyrants are raping the rights of women by removing a woman’s right to decide by herself that she is happy and in agreement with sex.
Most of this anti-sex extremism originated in universities. The problem is that older female professors notice how the male professors lose interest in them, because the male professors are preoccupied by the constant stream of fresh young female students arriving every year.
This causes some of the older female professors to become extremely bitter and envious of the young female students that receive all of the love and attention from the male professors. A female professor becomes even more bitter if her relationship and sex-life at home is broken or nonexistent.
“Hell has no fury like a woman scorned.”
It is a case of vicious intrasexual competition: Older females trying to sabotage younger females and restrict their ability to engage in enjoyable consensual sex with men.
There have been cases of female professors interviewing or interrogating female students and then steadfastly trying to convince these students that they were raped, even though the students do not believe that they were raped. The prettier the student, the more that envy is triggered, and the more that other women try to backstab her.
“Yes means yes” should mean that a young woman was only raped if she says, “Yes, I was raped”, and not when she says, “No, professor, I was not raped.”
Some of these female professors need to be taught that no means no. They do not respect the sexual autonomy of pretty young female students. These envious female professors are not physically raping the female students, but they are mentally raping the students.
Psychological violence can be even more harmful than physical violence.
Women have a right to sexual autonomy, and anybody that seeks to cancel this right is a form of rapist. “Only yes means yes” is an extreme and insane ideology devised by tyrannical rapists and sadists, and they should be stopped in their tracks and firmly told, “No.”
They need to be stopped before they rape us all with their insane new laws, and before they remove our right to consent to sex and to decide for ourselves whether we are victims of a crime. No means no.
No, professor, my boyfriend did not rape me. I wanted it, and I enjoyed it very much, and I would do it again. If anybody is a rapist here, it is you, because I told you “No”, and you ignored me and proceeded anyway – in direct violation of my wishes.