Women that want beta-boyfriends

Understanding the dual-mating behavior of women.

Women that want beta-boyfriends

This article is intended for adult audiences. It covers the following topics:

The evolution of dual-mating behavior

In ancient times, humans lived in tribes. A tribe consisted of up to 40 or 50 people led by a strong masculine alpha male. His ability to be the alpha male (despite competitors) indicated that he most likely had a high-quality genome. Every woman in the tribe dreamed of being his partner, but this was impossible, because the tribe contained perhaps 10 to 25 women and only one alpha male.

Consequently, women were left with no choice other than to partner with beta males in the tribe. However, they still wished for the alpha male. Eventually, the process of evolution created a weird workaround that scientists call “the dual-mating strategy” of women.

The situation today is that a percentage of women have inherited this dual-mating mechanism from their ancestors. During the infertile days of their menstrual cycle (most days), these women feel most attracted to beta males with reduced masculinity. Yes, you read that correctly. Those women prefer to make a relationship with a beta male, not with an alpha male.

However, during the few fertile days of their menstrual cycle, their preference flips completely, and they feel strongly attracted to alpha males and repulsed by beta males. When their fertile days pass, they revert back to feeling more attracted to beta males.

This temporary reversal of attraction occurs approximately once per month (the average length of a menstrual cycle is 28 days, ranging from 21 to 35 days).

Their subconscious goal is cuckoldry: Without even realizing what she is doing, this type of woman aims to get impregnated by a high-quality masculine alpha male while having a relationship with a kind supportive beta male (such as a “nice guy”). Her chosen beta male is noticeably less masculine than her chosen alpha male.

Only X% of women are dual-mating

It is important to understand and accept the fact that only a certain percentage of women have the dual-mating behavior. It is definitely not all women. Also, it seems to be genetically inherited rather than produced via socialization.

I belong to the percentage of women that did not inherit the dual-mating behavior. Throughout my entire menstrual cycle, I always feel more attracted to alpha and independent males than beta males.

During my fertile days, I simply feel even more strongly attracted to alpha and independent males than during my non-fertile days. My preference is stable and does not switch back-and-forth between alpha and beta.

If I was the dual-mating type, I probably would not tell you anything about the dual-mating behavior, because it is really not something to be proud of. In this article, I am sharing the information that I have learned from knowing dual-mating women in real life, and the knowledge that I have obtained by reading scientific literature about the dual-mating strategy.

What percentage of women are dual-mating?

I wish that I could tell you exactly what the percentage is, but at the time of writing this article, none of the scientific studies report the percentage.

More research is needed to determine the percentage of women that have dual-mating behavior, but this particular type of research is somewhat difficult to organize, because it requires acceptance of the fact that different types of humans exist.

Unfortunately, a substantial proportion of scientists have a strong subconscious wish to believe that all humans are fundamentally the same. These scientists feel deeply uncomfortable when faced with the scientific reality of human diversity. A few of them even delude themselves into believing that there are no significant differences between males and females!

In the movie “Don’t Look Up” (2021) starring Jennifer Lawrence and Leonardo DiCaprio, the character Dr. Randall Mindy (played by DiCaprio) makes the stereotypical mistake that too many scientists make in real life. That is, they treat both scientists and non-scientists as if they are the same.

Consequently, Dr. Mindy cluelessly talks to regular people using jargon that they cannot understand. Unwittingly, he makes them feel stupid, and so they hate him. In addition, he makes other social mistakes that cause him to be alienated from typical people, because he cannot bring himself to accept the existence of the huge differences between people and the need to treat different people differently. This problem also occurs in real life.

Consequently, when scientists study the sexual behavior of women, they tend to become overwhelmed by a deep-seated irrational urge to lump all the statistics together in an attempt to develop a single grand unified theory to describe all women.

Unsurprisingly, they fail at this, because different types of women exist. The collected data needs to be sorted into a number of buckets representing different types or categories of women. When all the data is thrown into one huge bucket and mixed together, the differences between different types of women become diluted and only weakly recognizable (if at all).

Too many scientists think that statements like the following are scientific statements:

“The latest review shows [or does not show] women changing the type of men they desire at different times in their fertility cycle.”

Those scientists are completely oblivious to the fact that such a statement is wildly unscientific and unprofessional, because it is a very sexist statement, because it claims that all women (or practically all women) behave the same way (or close enough).

Even an uneducated & illiterate person knows the basic fact that different women behave differently. Are women sluts? Only misogynists and some scientists answer “Yes” to this question. Everyone else knows that only X% of women are sluts.

Why are scientists so very unscientific in this manner? Because, for many of them, the belief that all humans are the same is fundamental to their motivation for being a scientist in the first place.

They have constructed an imaginary world, and inside this fake world, they have a good logical reason for wanting to be a scientist. Their imaginary world comes crashing down if they acknowledge the extent of human diversity, and they lose their whole reason for being a scientist.

A scientist’s denial of human diversity is what psychologists call a defense mechanism. The scientist subconsciously defends his motivation for being a scientist by denying all facts that would destroy or degrade his motivation for being a scientist.

Therefore, until the time arrives when scientists finally decide to stop being so unscientific about human diversity, nobody knows what the percentage is, because the research is incomplete.

A case study of a dual-mating woman

I will give you a good example of the behavior of a dual-mating woman. I will call her “Brooklyn” in this article. I will change a few insignificant details to protect the privacy/identity of Brooklyn and her boyfriend. She was a friend of mine, and we talked about our sex lives many times, thus I gained an understanding of her sexuality.

I recognized that her sexual behavior matched perfectly with the descriptions of the dual-mating strategy that I had read in scientific literature. On multiple occasions, she shared details about her sex life with me, and I was reminded of matching details in scientific studies. It became clear to me that she was an exemplar of the dual-mating strategy.

One day, she visited me at home when my boyfriend was also present, as she had done multiple times in the past. This time I began to notice that she was giving my boyfriend much more attention than she had in the past.

She was looking at him more often and longer, and she was chatting with him a lot and smiling a lot and chuckling at things that he said. I began to wonder whether she was actually visiting him instead of me.

She touched his arm briefly. I noticed, and I frowned slightly, but neither of them was looking at me. Eventually, after she touched him for the third time, I interrupted their conversation.

I asked her sternly, “Are you flirting with my boyfriend?”

She reacted as if she was genuinely surprised by her own behavior, as if she had not realized what she had been doing. She apologized to me profusely. Her apology seemed genuine.

Then she complimented my boyfriend in multiple ways, and she described herself as succumbing to temptation by accident. She could hardly control herself. She must have been in the fertile phase of her menstrual cycle. This caused her to feel strongly attracted to my boyfriend – a man that behaved like an alpha male or an independent male, and clearly not like a subservient beta male.

After hearing what Brooklyn had said, my boyfriend was grinning broadly. Like a smartass, he asked her, “So, are your panties wet?”

She did not answer his question. Instead, she made an astoundingly bold request. In a sympathetic way, she asked me if I would ever consider sharing my boyfriend with her for just one hour. Then she quickly explained that she would totally understand if I said no.

She said that she did not expect me to say yes. She said that she was just awfully hopeful and wishful and that she would be eternally grateful if I just happened to be so amazingly generous with my boyfriend. She was almost twitching with lust to get fucked by him.

I was amazed by the fact that she had not mentioned her boyfriend at all. Her nice beta-boyfriend with reduced masculinity and little or no dominance (and no playfulness either).

I asked, “Wouldn’t you feel guilty about cheating on your boyfriend?”

She said that she had broken up with him approximately one month ago.

I said, “But you’re still living together!”

She explained that he was looking for a small house to rent near his workplace, and that it was taking time to find one and organize it.

I said, “You told me a week or two ago that you had sex with him, and you wished that his technique was better.”

She nodded and replied, “Yes, we’re still having sex occasionally, but we’ve agreed that our relationship has ended, and he will move out as soon as he rents a place near his work.”

I said critically, “That’s hardly a way to show him that the relationship has ended.”

She replied, “I have needs. He understands.”

I said, “Apparently he’s no good at fulfilling your needs.”

She grinned and agreed.

I thought for a moment, and then I turned to my boyfriend and asked him, “Do you want to fuck her?”

He was surprised by my question. He had not expected it at all. I believe that he suspected that it was a trick question, or he wondered whether I was tricking him or trapping him. He knew that he should think very carefully before answering.

This article continues.

Please subscribe to read the rest of this article.

Subscribe

🤍 You can read more of my articles in my online magazine “Tackle & Succeed”.

Subscribe to receive notifications of new articles:

Copyright © 2025-26 Joycerocracy Publishing. This article contains satire and/or black comedy, and it is provided only for the purpose of entertainment. Accuracy is not guaranteed at all. If you need real advice or assistance with relationships or sex, please visit a therapist or a psychologist.